A federal appeals court has upheld a ruling that disqualifies Alina Habba from serving as the acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey. Habba, who previously worked as a personal lawyer for former President Donald Trump, was removed after a legal challenge questioned the legitimacy of her appointment. Read More
The decision came in response to a motion filed by a criminal defendant seeking to dismiss his case. The defendant argued that Habba’s appointment was unlawful, and therefore any charges she brought lacked legal authority. The appeals court agreed, confirming the lower court’s ruling that her service in the top prosecutor role was invalid.
Habba’s appointment had been controversial from the start. Federal law allows interim U.S. Attorneys to serve for a limited period unless formally confirmed by the Senate. In Habba’s case, her interim period had expired, but the administration attempted to keep her in position through procedural maneuvers. The courts found these moves violated federal appointment laws.
The ruling underscores the importance of following established legal procedures for high-level federal appointments. It also has potential implications for ongoing cases in New Jersey, as defendants may challenge actions taken under Habba’s authority.
This decision reaffirms that federal appointments must comply with both statutory rules and judicial oversight, ensuring that the justice system operates with proper authority and accountability.
